On this page
This is the part of camera ownership that changes fastest, and the advice written two years ago is wrong in both directions.
What actually happened, in order
Until January 2024. Ring’s Neighbors app carried a Request for Assistance tool that let public safety agencies post requests for footage to users in an area.
January 2024. Ring removed that tool. Agencies could still post publicly in the app, but asking users for video through it stopped, and requests for footage had to go through formal legal channels unless the company judged there was an emergency.
October 2025. Ring announced Community Request with Axon, which brings in-app requests back in a different shape. Officers create a geo-targeted request with a location, a timeframe, an investigative code and incident details, and it appears in the Neighbors feed for users nearby. Clips that people choose to share flow into Axon’s evidence system with chain of custody attached.
The companies’ description of the safeguards is specific: participation is entirely voluntary, residents decide if and how they share, and if somebody ignores a request the agency is not told, so anonymity is preserved.
Voluntary request, legal order: two different things
A voluntary request is somebody asking. You can share, share part, or do nothing. Nothing legal follows from declining.
A warrant, subpoena or court order is a legal instrument. It may be served on you or directly on the company holding your footage, and the company’s policy is what governs what happens to cloud-stored video in that case. Read your provider’s law enforcement guidelines to see what it says it does when served, and whether it tells customers.
Emergency disclosures are the third category. Most providers reserve the right to give information to authorities without a request from you where there is a risk of death or serious injury. That is in the policy you agreed to.
If you ever receive something that looks like a legal order and you are unsure what it requires, that is a question for a lawyer, not for a website.
How to decide what to share
A reasonable household position, decided in advance:
- Share what shows the incident, not the whole day. Export the clip with a couple of minutes either side.
- Do not share footage of neighbours’ property beyond what is unavoidable in the frame.
- Keep your own copy of anything you hand over, with the date, the time and who asked.
- Be careful about live access. Handing over a clip is not the same as granting somebody a live view of your home.
- If it involves your own household, think first. Footage is neutral about who it incriminates.
Public posts in neighbourhood apps are a separate risk. A clip posted to a local feed with a caption identifying somebody can be wrong, can be defamatory and can follow a person for years. If you would not be comfortable being identified from it yourself, do not post it.
If you would rather not be asked at all
- Check the app’s settings for neighbourhood features and in-app requests, and turn off what you do not want.
- Consider local recording for cameras where you would prefer nothing to be held by a company at all. Footage on a recorder in your house is still reachable by a legal order, but it is not sitting on somebody else’s server by default.
- Turn off public posting features so your clips are not shared onward by accident.
What footage is actually good for
Realistically, two things: telling you what happened, and giving investigators a clear image of a face, a vehicle or a time. It is far less useful for a live response, because nobody is watching it in real time, and less useful again if the retention window has already overwritten it.
That is the practical argument for a decent retention period and for exporting anything important the same day. A clip you kept is evidence. A clip that expired is a story.
Related reading: Price Local Camera Recording as a Complete System and A Camera Installation Quote Needs a Complete Handover.
Questions people ask
Can police access my Ring camera without permission?
Through the app's Community Request feature they can ask, and sharing is voluntary. Obtaining footage without your agreement requires a warrant or other valid legal process served on you or on the company, or an emergency disclosure under the provider's policy.
Did Ring stop letting police request footage?
It removed the Request for Assistance tool in January 2024, then in October 2025 introduced Community Request with Axon, which brings geo-targeted in-app requests back with voluntary sharing.
Will police know if I ignore a request for my video?
According to the companies' announcement of Community Request, no: participation is voluntary and if a resident ignores a request the agency is not told, so anonymity is preserved.
Should I post doorbell footage in a neighbourhood app?
Be careful. Clips posted with a caption identifying somebody can be wrong and can do lasting harm. Sharing a clip privately with investigators is a different act from broadcasting it to a local feed.
Where these figures come from
- Building safer communities together: Axon and Ring launch Community Request partnership Axon · axon.com
- FTC Says Ring Employees Illegally Surveilled Customers, Failed to Stop Hackers from Taking Control of Users' Cameras Federal Trade Commission · ftc.gov
- Ring subscription plans Ring · ring.com
Figures last checked September 2026.
